满城尽带黄金甲

Drunk Man 'Smashed His Way Out of Coffin After Being Buried Alive as Sacrifice to Mother Earth'_我的网站

一 |     A 30-year-old Bolivian found himself buried alive by festival-goers as a "sacrifice to mother earth" when he lost his conciousness due to heavy drinking.,The incident occured at the opening of the Mother Earth Festival in El Alto, Bolivia, on 5 August, with the man, who was identified as Víctor Hugo Mica Alvarez, coming to inside a coffin.,As part of the festival, indigenous Bolivians honor Pachamama, the goddes of earth and fertility, by giving offerings, known as "sullu," such as livestock or cocoa leaves and sweets.,While there's no confirmation that human sacrifices are being carried out too, Alvarez believes that it's exactly what happened to him.,"We went dancing. And afterwards I don't remember. The only thing I remember is that I thought I was in my bed, I wanted to get up to go urinate and I couldn't move. When I pushed the coffin, I was able to break a glass that it had and that way I was able to get out. They wanted to use me as a sullu," the 30-year-old told local Bolivian news outlet Página Siete.,When the man turned to police, they refused to believe him, saying he was too drunk.。    New Delhi, Oct 10 (UNI) Delhi High Court has passed an order to close all proceedings against Delhi Health Minister Satyendar Jain under the Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Amendment Act as per the judgment of Supreme Court on Benami law.

Justice Yashwant Varma after hearing a number of petitions filed by Jain and others against the initiation of proceedings under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 passed an order that in view of judgment passed by Supreme Court the writ petitions are allowed and the proceedings initiated under the enactment shall consequently closed.

Delhi High Court on last date of hearing passed an order that no coercive action shall be taken against Delhi's Health Minister Satyendar Jain and other petitioners under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016.

The Supreme of India has held in a case that Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 did not have retrospective application and the authorities cannot initiate or continue confiscation proceedings for transactions entered into prior to the coming into force of the legislation.

Counsel for Jain had filed a petition in 2017 against the proceedings initiated against him under the new Benami law by submitting that the Benami proceedings against him were in the nature of political persecution.

Counsel further submitted that the alleged Benami transactions, from the proceeds of which certain attached assets were claimed to have been purchased, took place between 2011 to March 31, 2016 so the amendment which came into effect in November 2016 would not apply.

UNI XC SHK2234。

Current article:http://www.laojiusidaosenleliao.bond/list_d1kwx/me6jp.doc

Published on:08:45:53