dnf

让AI长出Office 金山办公“灵犀”智能体不止于对话_我的网站

海贼王

一 | Coupang has sued to halt a Fair Trade Commission inspection into whether price-matching coupon costs were shifted to suppliers. Coupang trucks are parked near the e-commerce platform's logistics center in Seoul on Dec. 29, 2025. YONHAPCoupang has repelled attempts by inspectors from the antitrust watchdog to launch an on-site inspection over allegations that the e-commerce powerhouse shifted costs to suppliers. In rebuffing the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) officers, the company said that it has not received a legally required notice prior to the inspection. FTC Chairman Ju Biung-ghi said after the failed raid on Wednesday that he will pursue criminal charges.Coupang's refusal to comply with an on-site investigation by the FTC marks the first time since the regulator was established that a company has rejected an inspection outright, in this case on the grounds that "the law was applied improperly."The commission attempted to launch inspections at Coupang on four occasions, from Aug. 19 to Friday and again on Monday, but withdrew each time.Investigators were seeking to determine whether Coupang improperly passed the cost of its "price-matching coupons" on to its suppliers.The coupons are issued automatically when a product sold on the platform is priced higher than on a competing online marketplace, bringing the actual purchase price down to roughly the lowest available. The commission is examining whether the resulting discount costs were shifted onto suppliers.Coupang's argument against the investigation revolves around a notification clause in the law that was not applied. Article 17 of the Framework Act on Administrative Investigations requires an administrative agency, as a general rule, to notify the subject of an on-site inspection in writing at least seven days in advance. The Korean headquarters of e-commerce platform Coupang in Songpa District, southern Seoul NEWS1In a statement on Tuesday, Coupang said the notice requirement is "a lawful procedure that guarantees the interests and rights of the party under investigation" and that the company "plans to seek a court ruling on the commission's failure to observe that procedure."However, the same article stipulates that the notice "may be presented to the person subject to investigation simultaneously with the commencement of the administrative investigation or the purposes" when "it is deemed impossible to achieve the purposes of the investigation due to an anticipated destruction of evidence."The commission's position is that the exception applies here because advance notice would have created a risk of evidence destruction. Coupang counters that this investigation does not meet the conditions for the exception.The e-commerce titan argues that the concern is not credible given that it cooperated with other extended on-site inspections at its headquarters by the commission and other government agencies from January, following a massive personal data breach.The outcome now rests with the courts. On Friday, Coupang filed a suit seeking to cancel the commission's decision and disposition authorizing the on-site inspection, along with an injunction to halt the investigation. Delivery trucks wait at a Coupang logistics center in Seoul. YONHAP"It is unusual for an on-site inspection by the commission to fall apart because the company under investigation refused it," an industry source told the JoongAng Ilbo. "Depending on the court's decision, the commission's overall practice of conducting on-site inspections without advance notice could be shaken, and other companies under investigation could demand procedural rights the way Coupang has."The ruling liberal Democratic Party sharply criticized Coupang's refusal to comply with the investigation, saying no company can stand above Korean law."Coupang is using claims of discrimination against U.S. companies by the U.S. government and political circles as a shield to evade legitimate domestic regulation and investigation," DP spokesperson Lee Yong-woo said Wednesday in a written statement. "The company's double standard, enjoying enormous profits in the Korean market but invoking its status as a U.S. company only when it is time to take responsibility, is infuriating."。 IT时报记者郝俊慧 “市面上会聊天的AI很多，能把结果直接交付出来的不多。”7月17日，上海世博展览馆，当工作人员和记者说这句话时，身后大屏上灵犀正在自动拆解一份销售数据，生成带公式的Excel和可编辑的PPT，全程没有人碰过键盘。一年前，人工智能展会上比拼的还是模型能否写文章、生成PPT、回答问题；今年，WAIC 2026展台上最热的关键词变成了“智能体”。然而，许多产品团队都很清楚，真正决定产品竞争力的，是AI能否理解场景、调用工具，并最终交付可用成果。

二 | 本届WAIC，金山办公以“AI办公效率合作伙伴”为主题，带来了刚刚在“2026 AI生产力大会”发布的两款智能体产品：面向个人用户的灵犀专业版，以及面向组织用户的全新组件WPS Comate。

三 | 其中，灵犀专业版为个人用户提供专属AI办公助理；WPS Comate则作为全新组件，推动WPS 365向组织级AI办公平台升级，帮助企业“长出大脑和手脚”。 AI重新定义办公软件 “办公软件正在进入第三个时代：从单机办公、协同办公，走向AI办公。AI重构的不是软件，而是工作完成的范式：过去是人操作软件，今天是人提出目标、AI参与完成。

四 | ”金山办公CEO章庆元说出了此次新品发布的底层逻辑。灵犀专业的能力分为三层：一是懂上下文，以项目为单位沉淀写作风格和数据偏好，越用越懂你；二是高质量交付，能调用文档、处理数据、打开浏览器、编写代码；三是Office专业操作，交付可编辑、可溯源的原生文件。

五 | “我们不是在Office上加一个AI，而是让AI长出Office。”金山办公助理总裁田然表示，灵犀专业版的目标不是在Office上加一个AI，而是让AI长出Office，以AI为原点，重新定义办公软件的形态。田然强调，文档的本质是人的语言，是沟通的载体，在AI时代不仅不会消亡，反而会变得更加重要。因此，灵犀专业版深度调用WPS原生API，确保AI生成的内容能够真正进入办公流程，成为可编辑、可审阅、符合格式规范的文档、表格和演示文稿，而不是一张无法继续加工的“答案图片”。首个将“企业大脑”交付落地如果说灵犀专业版解决的是个人效率问题，那么WPS Comate瞄准的则是组织级AI应用。穿过个人体验区，WAIC展台另一侧的WPS Comate演示区域吸引了更多企业用户驻足。 “企业不缺大模型，缺的是把模型能力融入业务流程、沉淀为组织能力的管理体系。”章庆元指出。这也是当前企业AI落地面临的核心挑战。通用大模型拥有广泛的世界知识，却不了解企业内部长期积累的业务文档、数据资产和流程经验。

六 | 而这些沉淀在组织内部的知识，正是AI从“通用智能”走向“企业智能”的关键。针对这一问题，金山办公副总裁王冬提出了组织级AI办公落地的“三二一”体系。所谓“三通”，即通知识、通数据、通能力。企业需要打通分散在文档、业务系统和流程中的知识与数据，让AI真正理解业务；同时连接ERP、CRM、OA等系统，让AI从“回答问题”进一步升级为“执行任务”；“两管”，则是管成本、管安全，让企业能够清晰掌握AI投入，并确保数据和权限安全；“一平”，是以WPS Comate作为统一入口，将上述能力整合在一个组织级AI平台中，避免不同AI工具割裂运行，推动企业形成长期可复用的智能能力。 “模型是发动机，但决定这辆车能否真正跑起来的，是数据是否打通、系统是否连接、成本是否可控、权限是否可管。

七 | ”章庆元说。谁是真正的AI搭子？钉钉月活2亿、飞书3000万、企微1亿……互联网时代，阿里、字节、微信抢掉了大部分协同办公的蛋糕，但AI换了一副牌。所有人都想当你的“AI办公搭子”，然而，竞争远没有结束。今年4月，德本咨询发布《2026行业级智能体TOP100》，WPS灵犀位列办公领域第一，超过飞书、钉钉等同类产品。与此同时，金山办公基于自研表格基座Qingqiu Agent打造的WPS AI表格Agent，在国际权威基准SpreadsheetBench Full 912全量榜单中取得73.46%的成绩，位列全球第一，并首次超过该榜单设定的71.33%人类专家基线。今年7月11日，该产品又以98.25%的成绩登上Verified 400专家精标榜单第一名。这些成绩背后，是围绕“AI如何真正进入工作流”的竞争。当每个人、每个组织都需要一个AI搭子时，真正的胜负手并不只是模型参数，而是谁能让AI更懂工作、更懂业务，也更接近真实的生产场景。